Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use correct 64bit full multiplication for MinGW on ARM64 #1057

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

vejbomar
Copy link
Contributor

Update fast_float code from charconv to use correct 64bit full multiplication for MinGW on ARM64.

PR that did the same in charconv: boostorg/charconv#230

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://1057.jsondocs.prtest.cppalliance.org/libs/json/doc/html/index.html

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.41%. Comparing base (5bdbb23) to head (b6c916f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1057   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.41%   93.41%           
========================================
  Files           91       91           
  Lines         8667     8667           
========================================
  Hits          8096     8096           
  Misses         571      571           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...detail/charconv/detail/fast_float/float_common.hpp 62.19% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5bdbb23...b6c916f. Read the comment docs.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link

@grisumbras grisumbras merged commit b6c916f into boostorg:develop Oct 22, 2024
3 checks passed
@grisumbras
Copy link
Member

Thank you for your contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants